ProductImpactTool.org

Verdieping

Bekijk hier artikelen over de ontwikkeling en toepassing van de Product Impact Tool en verwijzingen naar achtergrondtheorie.


Nederlandstalig

S. Dorrestijn & M. Vonk (2016), De privacy-vriendelijke zorgcamera die mensen desondanks niet wilden: Over de impacts en de moraal van techniek. In Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidszorg en Ethiek 26(3), pp. 73-78. download · vrij beschikbaar met dank aan Van Gorcum
Dit is een bondige uitleg van de Product Impact Tool met toepassing in het domein van technologie in de zorg.

S. Dorrestijn (2017), Impacts van interactieve schermen: Verslag van de workshop op 12 juli 2016. download
Toepassing van de Product Impact Tool in een onderzoeksproject over interactieve schermen in de openbare ruimte.

S. Dorrestijn (2011), Gedragsbeïnvloedende techniek en usability. In: Tijdschrift voor ergonomie 36(1), pp. 5(12). download · tijdschrift website
Artikel geschreven ten tijde van de ontwikkeling van de Product Impact Tool met verwijzingen naar achtergrondtheorie en een eerste versie van het model.

J. van Belle (2016), Ontwerpen met de Product Impact Tool. Bachelor Thesis Industrieel Ontwerpen, Universiteit Enschede. download
Afstudeerproject over het ontwikkelen van Product Impact Tool workshopmaterialen voor ontwerpers.


Engelstalig

T. B. Long, V. Blok, S.Dorrestijn, & P. Macnaghten, (2019), The design and testing of a tool for developing responsible innovation in start-up enterprises“. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1-31. download

W. Eggink & S. Dorrestijn (2018), Philosophy of Technology x Design: the Practical Turn. In Storni, C. et.al. (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS 2018: Design as a catalyst for change (Vol. I, pp. 190-200). London: Design Research Society. download (excerpt from proceedings online)

J. van Belle, S. Dorrestijn & W. Eggink (2018), Design for People & Society: Turning the Product Impact Tool into a Design Tool. Paper presented at the Philosophy of Human Technology Relations conference; DesignLab, Enschede (the Netherlands); 11-13 July. repository University of Twente.

T. Raub, S. Dorrestijn & W. Eggink (2018) Using the Product Impact Tool for Prospective Thinking. In: Storni et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the biannual Design Research Society conference (DRS) Catalyst; Limerick (Ireland); 25-28 June 2018; pp. 253-268 ; repository University of Twente.

J. van Belle, B. Giesberts & W. Eggink (2018) The Use of Philosophical Theories in Design: A Research-Through-Design Case of Treatment Compliance. In: Storni et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the biannual Design Research Society conference (DRS) Catalyst; Limerick (Ireland); 25-28 June 2018; pp. 218-228 ; repository University of Twente

S. Dorrestijn (2017), The Product Impact Tool: the Case of the Dutch Public Transport Chip Card. In Niedderer, K., Clune, S., & Ludden, G. (Eds.). Design for Behaviour Change: Theories and practices of designing for change (pp. 26-39). Abingdon & New York: Routledge. download

S. Dorrestijn, M.C. van der Voort & P.P.C.C. Verbeek (2014),  Future user-product arrangements: Combining product impact and scenarios in design for multi age success In: Technological Forecasting & Social Change,vol. 89, pp. 284-292. download · publisher website

S. Dorrestijn & W. Eggink (2014), Product Impact Tool Workshop: Mastering Affect and Effect in Human-Product Relations. In: Salamanca, J., Desmet, P., Burbano, A., Ludden, G., Maya, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Colors of Care: The 9th International Conference on Design & Emotion. Bogotá, October 6-10, 2014 (pp. 467-469). Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes. download

S. Dorrestijn (2012), The design of our own lives: Technical mediation and subjectivation after Foucault. Enschede: University of Twente (PhD thesis). download

S. Dorrestijn (2012), Theories and figures of technical mediation. In: J. Donovan and W. Gunn (ed.), Design and Anthropology (pp. 219-230). Surrey, UK; Burlington, USA: Ashgate. download draft · publisher website

S. Dorrestijn (2012), The Product Impact Tool: Designing for user-guiding and user-changing. In: Van Kuijk, J.I. (ed.), Design for Usability: Methods & Tools – A Practitioner’s Guide (pp. 110-119). Delft: Design United/IOP-IPCR Design for Usability research project. download · book website


Bibliografie met achtergrondtheorie

Hieronder een uitgbreide bibliografie met werken waarnaar wordt verwezen in het proefschrift-hoofdstuk over de ontwikkeling van het Product Impact Tool model:

Achterhuis, H. (1998). De erfenis van de utopie. Amsterdam: Ambo. (“The legacy of utopia”).

Achterhuis, H. (2001). Introduction: American philosophers of technology. In: Idem, American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Anders, G. (1980). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. 2 Vol. München: Beck.

Bentham, J. (1995). The Panopticon writings. (M. Bozovic, ed.), London and New York: Verso.

Bentham, J. (2002). Panoptique. Mémoire sur un nouveau principe pour construire des maisons d’inspection, et nommément des maisons de force. Paris: Mille et une nuits.

Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. A. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Canguilhem, G. (1965) Machine et organisme. In: Idem. La connaissance de la vie. 2e druk, Parijs: Vrin, 101-127.

Coolen, M. (1992). De machine voorbij : Over het zelfbegrip van de mens in het tijdperk van de informatietechniek. Meppel: Boom.

Debray, R. (2000). Transmitting culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

Diamond, J. M. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel : the fates of human societies. New York: Norton & Co.

Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Knopf.

Feenburg (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revised. New York: Oxford University Press.

Flusser, V. (1999). The shape of things: A philosophy of design. London: Reaktion Books.

Flusser, V. (1994). Vom Subjekt zum Projekt: Menschwerdung. Bensheim: Bollmann.

Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Amsterdam; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Friedel, R. D. (2007). A culture of improvement: Technology and the Western millennium. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Giedion, S. (1948). Mechanization takes comman: A contribution to anonymous history. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Habermas, J. (1968). Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science, and politics. Boston: Beacon Press. (Including translations of the essays from Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968).

Habermas, J. (1985). Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon Press.

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialsist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, no. 80, 65-108.

Havelock, E. A. (1986). The muse learns to write: Reflections on orality and literacy from antiquity to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Die Frage nach der Technik. In Die Technik und die Kehre. Stuttgart: Neske, pp. 5-36.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.

Heidegger, M. (1981). Only a God Can Save Us : The Spiegel Interview (trans. W. Richardson). In Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker (ed. T. Sheehan) (pp. 45-67). Chicago: Precedent Press.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ihde, D. (2008). Ironic technics. [Copenhagen]: Automatic Press/VIP.

Ihde, D. (2010). Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press.

Jaspers, K. (1931) Die geistige Situation der Zeit. Berlijn/Leipzig: De Gruyter.

Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Jordan P. (1998) An Introduction to Usability. London, Bristol: Taylor & Francis.

Jordan P. (1998). An Introduction to Usability. London: Taylor & Francis.

Kapp, E. (1877). Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Braunsweig: Westermann.

Kapp, E. (2007). Principes d’une philosophie de la technique (trans. G. Chamayou). Paris: Vrin.

Kittler, F. (1986). Grammophon Film Typewriter. Berlin: Brinkmann & Bose.

Kockelkoren, P. (2003). Technology: Art, fairground and theatre, Rotterdam: NAI.

Kockelkoren, P. (2007). The artist as researcher. In ibid. (Ed.), Mediated vision. Rotterdam: Veenman and Arnhem: ArtEZ Press.

Latour (2002) Morality and Technology: The End of the Means. In Theory, Culture & Society, 19/5&6, pp. 247-260.

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses?: The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.) (1992). Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. London: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Lecourt, D. (2003). Humain, posthumain: La technique et la vie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Le Corbusier (2005). Vers une architecture. Paris: Flammarion

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon.

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology  (ed. C.J. Arthur). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

McLuhan, M.,. (2003). Understanding media: The extensions of man (Critical edition by W. T Gordon). Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press.

McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage. New York,: Random House.

McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1988). Laws of media: The new science. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

McNeill, W. H. (1987). The Eccentricity of Wheels, or Eurasian Transportation in Historical Perspective. In The American Historical Review, 92(5), pp. 1111-1126.

McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Merton, R.K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthew Effect. In Social Forces 74 (2), pp. 379-424).

Mumford, L. (1970). The Pentagon of Power. The myth of the machine, Vol. II. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 

Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London ; New York: Methuen.

Schivelbusch, W. (1988). Disenchanted night: The industrialisation of light in the nineteenth century. Oxford and New York: Berg.

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1. The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press.

Tenner, E. (2003). Our own devices: The past and future of body technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., & Verbeek, P-P. (2011). Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience. In Design Issues 27(3), pp. 3-19.

Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsyvania, Pennsyvania State University Press.

Verbeek, P.P. & P. Kockelkoren (1998). The Things that Matter. in Design Issues 14(3), pp. 28-42

Verbeek, P.P.(2011). De grens van de mens: Over techniek, ethiek en de menselijke natuur. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat

Verbeek, P.-P., & Slob, A. (2006). User behavior and technology development: Shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies. Dordrecht: Springer.

Winner, L. (1986). Do artifacts have politics? In: The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.