Texts about the Product Impact Tool:
background theory, development, applications.

S. Dorrestijn & W. Eggink (2022), Human-technology relations down to earth. Presentation for PHTR 2022 conference. See abstract

S. Dorrestijn (2020), A Tool for the Impact and Ethics of Technology: The Case of Interactive Screens in Public Spaces. In Heather Wiltse (Ed.), Relating to Things: Design, Technology and the Artificial (151-172). London & New York: Bloomsbury. download draft · publisher website

T. B. Long, V. Blok, S.Dorrestijn, & P. Macnaghten (2020), The design and testing of a tool for developing responsible innovation in start-up enterprises“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(1), pp. 45-75 download

W. Eggink & S. Dorrestijn (2018), Philosophy of Technology x Design: the Practical Turn. In Storni, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS 2018: Design as a catalyst for change (Vol. I, pp. 190-200). London: Design Research Society. download (excerpt from proceedings online)

J. van Belle, S. Dorrestijn & W. Eggink (2018), Design for People & Society: Turning the Product Impact Tool into a Design Tool. Paper presented at the Philosophy of Human Technology Relations conference; DesignLab, Enschede (the Netherlands); 11-13 July. repository University of Twente.

T. Raub, S. Dorrestijn & W. Eggink (2018) Using the Product Impact Tool for Prospective Thinking. In: Storni et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the biannual Design Research Society conference (DRS) Catalyst; Limerick (Ireland); 25-28 June 2018; pp. 253-268 ; repository University of Twente.

J. van Belle, B. Giesberts & W. Eggink (2018) The Use of Philosophical Theories in Design: A Research-Through-Design Case of Treatment Compliance. In: Storni et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the biannual Design Research Society conference (DRS) Catalyst; Limerick (Ireland); 25-28 June 2018; pp. 218-228 ; repository University of Twente

S. Dorrestijn (2017), The Product Impact Tool: the Case of the Dutch Public Transport Chip Card. In Niedderer, K., Clune, S., & Ludden, G. (Eds.). Design for Behaviour Change: Theories and practices of designing for change (pp. 26-39). Abingdon & New York: Routledge. download

S. Dorrestijn, M.C. van der Voort & P.P.C.C. Verbeek (2014),  Future user-product arrangements: Combining product impact and scenarios in design for multi age success In: Technological Forecasting & Social Change,vol. 89, pp. 284-292. download · publisher website

S. Dorrestijn & W. Eggink (2014), Product Impact Tool Workshop: Mastering Affect and Effect in Human-Product Relations. In: Salamanca, J., Desmet, P., Burbano, A., Ludden, G., Maya, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Colors of Care: The 9th International Conference on Design & Emotion. Bogotá, October 6-10, 2014 (pp. 467-469). Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes. download

S. Dorrestijn (2012), The design of our own lives: Technical mediation and subjectivation after Foucault. Enschede: University of Twente (PhD thesis). download

S. Dorrestijn (2012), Theories and figures of technical mediation. In: J. Donovan and W. Gunn (ed.), Design and Anthropology (pp. 219-230). Surrey, UK; Burlington, USA: Ashgate. download draft · publisher website

S. Dorrestijn (2012), The Product Impact Tool: Designing for user-guiding and user-changing. In: Van Kuijk, J.I. (ed.), Design for Usability: Methods & Tools – A Practitioner’s Guide (pp. 110-119). Delft: Design United/IOP-IPCR Design for Usability research project. download · book website

Bibliography with background theory

In the following an extensive bibliography from the thesis about the development of the Product Impact Tool model. For further reading:

Achterhuis, H. (1998). De erfenis van de utopie. Amsterdam: Ambo. (“The legacy of utopia”).

Achterhuis, H. (2001). Introduction: American philosophers of technology. In: Idem, American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Anders, G. (1980). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. 2 Vol. München: Beck.

Bentham, J. (1995). The Panopticon writings. (M. Bozovic, ed.), London and New York: Verso.

Bentham, J. (2002). Panoptique. Mémoire sur un nouveau principe pour construire des maisons d’inspection, et nommément des maisons de force. Paris: Mille et une nuits.

Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. A. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Canguilhem, G. (1965) Machine et organisme. In: Idem. La connaissance de la vie. 2e druk, Parijs: Vrin, 101-127.

Coolen, M. (1992). De machine voorbij : Over het zelfbegrip van de mens in het tijdperk van de informatietechniek. Meppel: Boom.

Debray, R. (2000). Transmitting culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

Diamond, J. M. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel : the fates of human societies. New York: Norton & Co.

Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Knopf.

Feenburg (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revised. New York: Oxford University Press.

Flusser, V. (1999). The shape of things: A philosophy of design. London: Reaktion Books.

Flusser, V. (1994). Vom Subjekt zum Projekt: Menschwerdung. Bensheim: Bollmann.

Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Amsterdam; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Friedel, R. D. (2007). A culture of improvement: Technology and the Western millennium. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Fuller, S. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Giedion, S. (1948). Mechanization takes comman: A contribution to anonymous history. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Habermas, J. (1968). Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science, and politics. Boston: Beacon Press. (Including translations of the essays from Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968).

Habermas, J. (1985). Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon Press.

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialsist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, no. 80, 65-108.

Havelock, E. A. (1986). The muse learns to write: Reflections on orality and literacy from antiquity to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Die Frage nach der Technik. In Die Technik und die Kehre. Stuttgart: Neske, pp. 5-36.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.

Heidegger, M. (1981). Only a God Can Save Us : The Spiegel Interview (trans. W. Richardson). In Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker (ed. T. Sheehan) (pp. 45-67). Chicago: Precedent Press.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ihde, D. (2008). Ironic technics. [Copenhagen]: Automatic Press/VIP.

Ihde, D. (2010). Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press.

Jaspers, K. (1931) Die geistige Situation der Zeit. Berlijn/Leipzig: De Gruyter.

Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Jordan P. (1998) An Introduction to Usability. London, Bristol: Taylor & Francis.

Jordan P. (1998). An Introduction to Usability. London: Taylor & Francis.

Kapp, E. (1877). Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Braunsweig: Westermann.

Kapp, E. (2007). Principes d’une philosophie de la technique (trans. G. Chamayou). Paris: Vrin.

Kittler, F. (1986). Grammophon Film Typewriter. Berlin: Brinkmann & Bose.

Kockelkoren, P. (2003). Technology: Art, fairground and theatre, Rotterdam: NAI.

Kockelkoren, P. (2007). The artist as researcher. In ibid. (Ed.), Mediated vision. Rotterdam: Veenman and Arnhem: ArtEZ Press.

Latour (2002) Morality and Technology: The End of the Means. In Theory, Culture & Society, 19/5&6, pp. 247-260.

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses?: The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.) (1992). Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. London: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Lecourt, D. (2003). Humain, posthumain: La technique et la vie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Le Corbusier (2005). Vers une architecture. Paris: Flammarion

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon.

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology  (ed. C.J. Arthur). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

McLuhan, M.,. (2003). Understanding media: The extensions of man (Critical edition by W. T Gordon). Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press.

McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage. New York,: Random House.

McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1988). Laws of media: The new science. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

McNeill, W. H. (1987). The Eccentricity of Wheels, or Eurasian Transportation in Historical Perspective. In The American Historical Review, 92(5), pp. 1111-1126.

McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Merton, R.K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthew Effect. In Social Forces 74 (2), pp. 379-424).

Mumford, L. (1970). The Pentagon of Power. The myth of the machine, Vol. II. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 

Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London ; New York: Methuen.

Schivelbusch, W. (1988). Disenchanted night: The industrialisation of light in the nineteenth century. Oxford and New York: Berg.

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1. The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press.

Tenner, E. (2003). Our own devices: The past and future of body technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., & Verbeek, P-P. (2011). Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience. In Design Issues 27(3), pp. 3-19.

Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsyvania, Pennsyvania State University Press.

Verbeek, P.P. & P. Kockelkoren (1998). The Things that Matter. in Design Issues 14(3), pp. 28-42

Verbeek, P.P.(2011). De grens van de mens: Over techniek, ethiek en de menselijke natuur. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat

Verbeek, P.-P., & Slob, A. (2006). User behavior and technology development: Shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies. Dordrecht: Springer.

Winner, L. (1986). Do artifacts have politics? In: The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.